翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ In re Ferguson
・ In re Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC
・ In re Gateway Learning Corp.
・ In re Gault
・ In re Gill
・ In re Guardianship of Kowalski
・ In re Hayes
・ In re Himmel
・ In re Kansas Indians
・ In re Kasinga
・ In re Lowry
・ In re Madden
・ In re Marriage Cases
・ In re Marriage of J.B. and H.B.
・ In re McUlta
In re Neagle
・ In re NLRB
・ In re Primus
・ In re Quinlan
・ In re Ross
・ In re Schrader
・ In re Sealed Case No. 02-001
・ In re Sears Holdings Management Corp.
・ In re Sherwood
・ In re Snyder
・ In re Stolar
・ In re Strittmater
・ In re Summers
・ In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001
・ In re The Bible Speaks


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

In re Neagle : ウィキペディア英語版
In re Neagle

''In re Neagle'', 135 U.S. 1 (1890), was a United States Supreme Court decision that determined the question of whether the Attorney General of the United States had authority to appoint U.S. Marshals as bodyguards to Supreme Court Justices.
==Facts==
U.S. Marshal David Neagle was appointed by the attorney general to serve as a bodyguard to Justice Stephen J. Field while he rode circuit in California. David S. Terry, a disappointed litigant with a grudge against Field, approached and appeared to be about to attack Field. Neagle shot and killed him. Neagle was arrested by California authorities on a charge of murder. The United States sought to secure the release of Neagle on a writ of habeas corpus. In the absence of a law specifically authorizing the appointment of bodyguards for Supreme Court Justices, the government relied on a statute that made the writ available to those "in custody for an act done or omitted in pursuance of a law of the United States."

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「In re Neagle」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.